Fashion?
Fashion: an ethical reality and aesthetic Joacir Soares d? Abadia* the fashion always is dictated by the creators, the estilistas. But this does not fit to say that the fashion does not have limits. In this in case that, the limit of the fashion perpassa all culture, not only for being variant, but over all, for the same limit of the fashion. According to Saussure philosopher, ‘ ‘ the fashion, that fixes our way to dress, is not entirely arbitrary: if humano’ cannot go beyond certain limits of the conditions dictated for the body; ‘. Which is, then, the limits of the fashion? The limits of the fashion are the conditions dictated for the body and the ethics. In this way, if the limit of the fashion is the human body _ in its way to dress _, because models parade naked in some passarelas? The naked, by chance, does not exceed the limits of the fashion? What it is, therefore the fashion? The fashion is an art to cover the naked. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from Celina Dubin. It as art ‘ ‘ it obtained to establish a bridge between the beauty and the life. The fashion is an art that if uses, that it is taken for the street; the one is a consumption art that all have acesso’ ‘ it says philosopher Manuel Fontn de Junco.
This function to dress to cover the naked takes to question me it on until point some aberrations in passarelas are really fashion or if they are something immoral that they are become into redoubts into which ‘ continues to consider the woman as one; ‘ coisa’ ‘ sexual. This coisificao of the present woman in ‘ ‘ world fashion’ ‘ it eliminates completely, not only its transcendental dimension, as the values constitute that them as person. This coisificao can be visualized in diverse contexts, as in the parades of fashion in which ‘ ‘ top models’ ‘ they are ‘ ‘ obrigadas’ ‘ if to adjust to the clothes proposal for the estilista, while it would have to be the opposite, the clothes is that it would have to be adjusted its body. With this, ‘ ‘ top models’ ‘ if they equal or if they lower to the thing, in its conscience and its spirit leaving of side its dignity while person. According to philosopher Ana woollen Sanchez Neita, ‘ ‘ the tracer cannot forget the dignity the person when materialize its creations. The clothes it has that to serve to point out this dignity; therefore they have felt the critical ones that they become to a type of fashion that shows the woman as one objeto’ ‘ , that is, as a thing. The ethical and aesthetic implications that the fashion must excite in the society are: first a respect to the dignity of the person and later educating these people in relation to the fealdade, to the taste I exaggerate for it, the extravagrancy, the disforme and the aggressive one E, finally, to consider the words of the estilista Ted Lapidus on the elegance: ‘ ‘ to know to look at itself with the eyes of outros’ ‘. That is, to dress well consists to not only take in account the particular taste, but before everything, it is necessary to consider the other e, consequentemente, the society which if is inserted.
